Futurology

You are currently browsing articles tagged Futurology.

Title says it all. For those so inclined, here’s my very late notice that I’ll be talking about Makerbots, Repraps and Thingiverse this Wednesday 14th in the Science Museum. The event starts at 6:30.

Ignite is an event that asks “Enlighten us, but make it quick”. It was started by Bre Pettis and Brady Forrest as a way for local communities to share ideas and raise the “collective IQ”, and is traditionally composed of a little Make contest first, (like “Best Bridge Made of Popsicle Sticks”) followed by a series of five minute talks.

Each talk covers something interesting, smart and geeky. The format is: 15 seconds per slide, automatically advancing, making for a total of 20 slides. The restrictive format encourages creative presentation and a sustained level of energy in the talks.

As I’m discovering all too late, it also makes it pretty hard to make a presentation if you’re used to ad-hoc! But for my next Ignite talk (he says ambitiously) I’ll know to start much earlier.

My working title at the moment is: “Makerbot, RepRap and Thingiverse: Invent, Share, Enjoy, Repeat“. I’ll be releasing the presentation under a Creative Commons by-sa license so people can play around with it and re-use it.

I’m both looking forward to this, and have a trepidation. I’m packing a really dense talk in here, and the 15 seconds/slide thing is going to drive me a little mad. My only requests of fate are:  1) That I don’t get tongue tied mid-sentence. 2) That I don’t simply confuse the hell out of everyone.

Tags: , , , ,

Rapid Prototyping is addictive. I knew it would be when I bought the Makerbot, but I didn’t know just how much. Since the moderate success of Dremelfuge, I’ve gone a step further into multi-part, assembled devices, and I’m proud of the result.

Microlathe is a Makerbot/Reprap printable Lathe that uses a Dremel for rotary power. I spent a day and a half designing the first draft of it in OpenSCAD, another evening printing the parts, and the minutes I could grab over the last few evenings testing it. The result? It’s fairly hazardous, requires careful balancing, and it works just fine on wood dowelling. So on the whole, a big success!

Here’s a link to a video of me demonstrating Microlathe. It’s taken on my HTC in low light, so the quality is poor; apologies! Microlathe draft two will merit High Definition, I think.

One of the reasons I designed and made Microlathe was because I wanted a free lathe. Another reason was to contribute to a pattern of accelerating returns I’ve become aware of and excited about recently, in the sphere of rapid prototyping.

When you give someone a tool, they can use that tool (within its limitations) to make things. You might reasonably expect someone with an axe and some trees to make fuel, but they could in principal master the art of the axe and use it to create lasting works like furniture or a shelter. It’s just really really hard to do with an axe, is all. A clever artisan might use his axe to make a simple mallet, which would enhance his ability to accurately control the force of the axe blade. He might use these to produce still more useful tools and products. This is an example of accelerating returns; tools making better tools to make better tools faster.

Leap forward, and give someone a rapid prototyping machine. These tools, be they laser cutters or 3D printers, are hugely open ended, and because they use CNC control the user can take his or her time in carefully planning each parameter of the final work before beginning, and even share the result if it works with other users. The essence of “Measure twice, cut once” in carpentry and many other crafts boils down to “If you muck up one step of the way, you’ve ruined the end result”. This reliance on expert skill and patience in creative or constructive arts has probably been one of the biggest barriers to people getting involved in making until recently, and with a CNC machine, it is no longer strictly necessary. This means you don’t have to spend years mastering the art of the axe just to make your mallet, you just need to click “print”.

So with this one starting tool, you can imagine a situation where a person can design/download and assemble a plethora of relatively complex tools in short order given only the cheap feedstock needed to run the Rapid Prototyper. That’s what I’m looking forward to and trying to drive forward, because this accelerating return is going to help push innovation to new heights at a grassroots level.

A Makerbot cost me about €750, all told (Of which €110 was shipping!). A full suite of tools might cost me that much or more, easily, but if they were printable it’d cost me a few extra euro. Probably less than 20. Given enough feedstock, I can even make the structural parts of another printer, and give that to my friend, who can make a fab lab of his own, etc. etc.

Obviously the Makerbot can’t make everything. For example, it can’t make its own heater barrel, which needs to be made out of metal. That task calls for a lathe. And now, you can print one of those. And because it’s open-source and available online, if it doesn’t work right or suit you as-is, you can just improve it.

Someday I’m hoping to see a printable CNC Router and Lathe on Thingiverse, so that I’ll be able to have my computer-controlled robot fablab build me almost anything I can desire or imagine, fast. The first thing I’ll probably make when it’s ready? Another Fab Lab!

Tags: , , ,

For a while preceding buying my own Arduino, I spent my time looking at all the cool projects people have used them for on the Make blog, Fashioning Technology and the Arduino wiki itself. Although I love all the projects that showcase the artistic use of electronics, and I’m impressed with the more utilitarian uses also, I see great untapped potential in the Arduino as a replacement technology for certain niches where equipment is prohibitively expensive.

One such niche I am intimately aware of is Biotechnology, particularly molecular biotechnology. For example, I work daily with a machine called a thermal cycler. These machines perform a seemingly simple duty; they accurately vary the temperature of a metal casing in which you place little plastic tubes containing your reaction mixes for molecular biology. You set them up to cycle through a variety of temperatures so as to help enzymes work at optimal efficiency, break the double-helix of DNA with heat, permit only certain molecules to adhere to one another during a reaction, or to inactivate enzymes through heat-treating. They are most often used for the Polymerase Chain Reaction, a cornerstone of modern genetics, and so they are often called PCR machines.

The odd thing about these machines is the cost. A thermal cycler can cost over €2,000 for a used robotic version, or as low as €200 for an ancient, damaged one. These machines almost universally have a poor interface, too; few can connect easily to a computer, and none are open-source.

What’s going on here? Am I missing some deep secret of thermal cyclers that should make them so expensive and limited? So far as I know, a modern thermal cycler technically only uses one basic technology; a Peltier thermoelectric device. These little semiconductor/ceramic plates get hot on one side and cool on the other when supplied with electricity, with the orientation depending on the polarity of the voltage. In short, the work like an electric heat pump, heating or cooling one side on demand. And, they cost less than €10 on ebay with free postage.

In principal all that’s needed to make one, then, is a Peltier unit, a temperature sensor (60c in Maplin), a little breadboarding ( < €20) and an Arduino (€20). Connect it to a PC, optimise your code, and you have a highly flexible Thermal cycler for less than €50.

This ties into something of a broader interest for me, that of someday having my own lab wherein to do my research. I think it’s just part of my personality that I feel compelled to do stuff for myself, and tend to lose interest in projects not my own. I look forward to working on nutty genetics projects that I fancy might, just might, have the potential to help improve the world..or at least look nice growing in a pot by the window.

Setting up a Genetics lab is the big obstacle here; because you need such specialised equipment and reagents, it’s not a simple matter of building a shed and ordering from a catalog. (Update: I started a shop on Shapeways where I am already selling some cheap lab equipment: LabsFromFabs) Although a growing community of people are taking an interest in homebrew biology, their ability to do so will be constrained by the price of setting up and maintaining a working lab.

Thankfully, this is slowly changing. Much as electronic technology used to be a very exclusive field until prices plummeted and homebrew electronics became an affordable hobby, certain powers that be are working to bring Biology labs into the home for enthusiasts and clubs. Update: See the LavaAmp for one such project that is already near the market!

One such effort is OpenWetWare, a wiki project that aims to build a directory of Protocols, Tutorials and Essays to teach the knowledge and practices of Biology online, for free. Most homebrew clubs I’ve encountered maintain a page on OpenWetWare to showcase their work or share their experiences.

Another, potentially even more revolutionary example is the Biobricks Foundation, which aims to standardise genetic material to enable swift, easy construction of complex genetic tools and systems. Although they suffer from a terrible website design and a general lack of beginner-friendly information or support, the system they are using is seemingly reliable and robust. It should require no more specialised equipment than four enzymes and a special breed of e.coli to start making things that glow, smell like bananas or release special enzymes in response to something. Technically.

Best of all, existing genetic “parts” (read; the bits of whole genes such as the coding sequence, promoter, terminator, etc) can be modified so that they are themselves new “Biobrick” parts, and can be added to the Biobricks Registry of Standard Parts. If someone wants your part, they can ask you to mail some over to them!

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, those interested in genetics at home will be excited to hear that I firmly believe a service will be available within this decade where you can simply order a gene from scratch and have it delivered already transformed into e.coli (at least!). Mail order GMOs.

I say this because you can go right now over to Mr. Gene and order up to 3kb worth of DNA to be synthesised from scratch at a competitive price (€0.32 per nucleotide), which is enough to contain a whole functioning bacterial gene. Not only that, but their web-tools will help you easily add in all the special sequences you want, while excluding those you don’t, while maintaining the coding sequence and optimising it by species. That’s pretty much all the hard work.

The price is still expensive; although €960 should cover 3kb at 35c/n, it can cost a bit more for a useful gene to be made due to the relative difficulties in synthesising odd or difficult sequences. However, I have learned (through my own travails working in a genetics lab) that producing and stably assembling a gene by yourself is sometimes so time consuming (months!) and expensive that you’d be better off just paying the extra money and getting a guaranteed sequence in 15 days.

It is a small step from being able to order a complete gene and the e.coli separately, and transforming them on your benchtop, to having a company do all of this for you in advance and delivering the finished, genetically modified product by courier.

It would also be a small thing to order a modified strain of another bacterium, known as Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The significant difference here is, Agrobacterium is known for its ability to transfer DNA into plants, and is routinely used as the most simplistic means of creating GMO plants. So, mail order transformed Agrobacterium = Mail order modified plants.

I eagerly look forward to this day. For the moment though, and coming back to the beginning of this post, I aim to create an open, free and publicly available design for at least one piece of specialised equipment. With this and other similar projects, I’m hoping lab equipment stops being so damned exclusive and comes quickly to the Maplin Catalog. Update: See LabsFromFabs, my Shapeways shop where I’m already selling some lab equipment!

And if someone else reading this has the tech savvy to help (I’m an electronics n00b), please do!

Edit: The price of gene synthesis wasn’t €0.35, it was $0.35. Much cheaper than I quoted.

Tags: , , ,